For decisions that are expensive to reverse

Structure the argument.
Elevate the insight.

arbitrIQ stress-tests high-stakes decisions through structured AI contradiction so you surface blind spots before they become expensive.

Designed for decisions where reversal is costly: acquisitions, major investments, market entry.

✓ Reduce blind-spot risk in board-level calls like M&A, capex, market entry.
✓ Faster than consulting, more structured than internal debate.
✓ Decision-ready output with opposing arguments, scoring, and rationale.
Launch arbitrIQ See How It Works See Example Report
arbitrIQ
Founding Customer Program Open

Early adopters shape the roadmap and receive permanent benefits. Learn more

GDPR-native (EU company)
Your data never trains models
Anthropic - OpenAI - Google

Executive overview

90 seconds
What it is: structured contradiction for high-stakes, hard-to-reverse decisions.
What you get: decision-ready report with both sides, scoring, rationale, and what remains uncertain.
Why it matters: surfaces blind spots early, before confidence becomes costly.
How it fits: faster than consulting, more rigorous than internal debate, built to support judgment.

arbitrIQ is a decision support environment: it surfaces opposing arguments, scoring, and uncertainty, while judgment and accountability remain with the decision-maker.

Detailed process, example output, and governance controls follow below.

Some decisions shape the future.
Others destroy it.

Strategic decisions are not routine choices. They are asymmetric bets.

Most failed decisions looked justified when they were approved.

Executive weighing options

The real danger is not bad ideas.
It is untested assumptions.

Every strategic proposal comes with:

Implicit beliefs that go unchallenged
Incomplete information treated as complete
Optimistic interpretations masking risk
Blind spots invisible to the decision-maker
When assumptions are not systematically challenged, confidence replaces rigor - and unmanaged risk becomes invisible.
Walking on thin ice

Today, leaders face an uncomfortable trade-off.

To gain decision confidence, you must choose between:

Option A: Rely on internal reasoning, limited debate, and time pressure.

Option B: Engage external strategic consultants at significant cost and delay.

Neither is ideal. One risks blind spots. The other consumes resources. Leaders choose between speed without structure - or structure without speed.
Leader facing trade-off

For thousands of years, good strategy came from structured debate.

The strongest decisions in history did not come from intuition, consensus, or single perspectives.

They came from disciplined contradiction - where opposing views are challenged under supervision and assumptions tested before commitment.

Structure was the safety mechanism.

Classical structured debate

Modern decisions are more complex.
Our process hasn't caught up.

Leaders now face overwhelming data volumes, faster cycles, and multidimensional risks.

Yet decisions still rely on fragmented analysis, isolated expert views, and single-model AI.

Modern tools increased speed, not structured contradiction. Rigorous strategic debate has not scaled with complexity.
Modern boardroom discussion

A capable team can do this. Governance requires that it happens every time.

Human teams can run rigorous debate once, when time allows and stakes feel contained. Under pressure, trade-offs emerge: incomplete research, softened opposition, unchallenged assumptions.

arbitrIQ makes structured contradiction non-optional. It enforces opposition, depth, and completeness without fatigue, politics, or selective rigor.

Often, critical business questions are of a binary kind.

Strategic clarity starts with framing the right question.

Should we acquire this competitor?
Should we invest €15M in this site?
Should we enter this market now, or wait 12 months?
Should we prioritize profitability or growth this year?
Is this risk acceptable - or existential?

Which door will you open?

Every major decision hides asymmetric consequences.
But you only see them after you commit.

Doors revealing different outcomes Doors revealing different outcomes

What if you could simulate structured strategic disagreement before you commit?

arbitrIQ replaces opinion with structured contradiction.

Every argument must survive opposition. The result: decisions backed by rigorous analysis, not just intuition.

Try arbitrIQ Now

How arbitrIQ Works

From question to decision-ready report

Step 1: Input & Planning

You submit your question and upload supporting documents (financials, reports, websites). The Director extracts data, clarifies the question with you if needed, and generates a debate plan with specific dimensions to examine.

Each dimension is a specific aspect of your question that requires full data analysis and debate.

Director generates debate plan

Step 2: Iterative Contradiction

For each dimension, agents engage in structured debate. Every argument must survive opposition.

Debate taking place between advocate and opposition

Step 3: Web Search & Grounding

The Director, Advocate, and Opposition have access to a sophisticated web search module. Search results are filtered, content is fetched and processed by a Summarizer agent.

This ensures arguments are grounded in current facts, not just training data.

Web search module

Step 4: Decision-Ready Report

The Director synthesizes all dimension debates - each with the Evaluator's report and full transcript - into a comprehensive final report.

Not just answers. Defensible decisions.

Director synthesizes report

Different models think differently.
arbitrIQ forces them to disagree.

Independently trained models reduce shared blind spots. Rich debates emerge from their opposition.

Access to all models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google

🎭­ Cancels Pleaser Bias

LLMs are trained to please. The debate framework forces genuine opposition.

🔄 Neutralizes Errors

Different data, different logic. Working together catches mistakes.

🔍 Forces Deeper Search

Many LLMs prefer training data. arbitrIQ forces them to search deeper.

📊 Larger Scale Analysis

Generates extremely long, coherent research across multiple dimensions.

Not all decisions require the same governance.

arbitrIQ allows leaders to adjust the breadth and depth of examination.

Governance profiles chart

Dimensions

1-7

Debate Depth

2-10

Model Diversity

Low-High

Web Search

On/Off

Report Detail

Concise-Verbose

See It In Action

"Should our company expand into the Southeast Asian market within the next 24 months?"

A consulting firm submitted financials, website, and context. arbitrIQ examined 4 dimensions:

• Market Opportunity & Demand Viability
• Operational Feasibility & Execution Risk
• Financial Sustainability & Break-Even
• Strategic Timing & Resource Allocation

Recommendation: Proceed only under staged entry with regulatory validation. Expansion not recommended under current leverage without capital buffer.

174K
Characters transcript
64
Pages of analysis
6
Page exec report
Case study results

Built for senior leaders and strategic consultants

arbitrIQ is designed to increase throughput and defensibility, not replace judgment.

📈 Higher leverage per engagement

Explore more scenarios per week, pressure-test assumptions, and arrive at stronger recommendations faster.

🧾 More defensible deliverables

Show clients what was challenged, what survived opposition, and what remains uncertain.

⏱ Faster pre-work and triage

Use arbitrIQ early to structure the problem, identify critical dimensions, and prioritize where humans should go deep.

🤝 Stronger client conversations

Bring both sides of the argument to the table. Fewer surprises, better governance, better alignment.

Launch arbitrIQ Enterprise and consulting plans

A simple framing

If a decision is expensive to reverse, it deserves structured contradiction. arbitrIQ scales that contradiction on demand, with transparency you can show to boards and clients.

Frequently Asked Questions

What executives and consultants want to know

Why would arbitrIQ outperform my preferred LLM?

Ask any single LLM "Should we acquire Company X?" and you'll get a helpful, confident answer. The problem: it's optimized to please you, not challenge you. It will rarely surface the counterarguments that keep experienced board members up at night.

arbitrIQ forces independently-trained models into structured opposition. The Advocate must defend the proposition; the Opposition must attack it. Neither can agree to disagree. The result is fundamentally different: arguments that have survived challenge, not just arguments that sound good.

Think of it as the difference between asking one advisor versus watching two experts debate in front of you.

How is my data handled securely?
Your documents and analyses are encrypted in transit and at rest. We do not use your data to train any models. Enterprise plans offer additional security options including on-premise deployment.
How long does an arbitrIQ analysis take?

Rapid triage: 2-3 dimensions, limited debate depth, typically under 10 minutes. Useful to surface major blind spots early.

Standard strategic review: 4-5 dimensions with structured opposition, usually 10-20 minutes.

High-stakes governance: 6-7 dimensions, deeper debate and web grounding, often 30+ minutes for board- or client-facing decisions.

Can I trust AI for critical decisions?
arbitrIQ is decision support, not decision replacement. Every recommendation comes with full transparency: complete debate transcript, arguments on each side, evaluator scoring, and reasoning behind the synthesis. You make the call - arbitrIQ ensures you've seen the best arguments from both sides first.
What is the Founding Customer Program?

We're selecting a limited number of early adopters to help shape arbitrIQ's development. Founding customers receive permanent pricing benefits (50% off their chosen tier for life), direct input on the product roadmap, and priority support.

In exchange, we ask for honest feedback and, if satisfied, permission to reference your use case. Contact us to learn more.

Simple, Transparent Pricing

One avoided blind spot typically offsets years of subscription cost. arbitrIQ is priced as software, but used for decisions that usually justify consulting budgets.

Enterprise-ready options

SSO, dedicated support, private deployments, and tailored governance profiles for leadership teams and consulting firms.

Single Governed Analysis
49€
One complete strategic analysis, configured and run on your terms

Ideal for a specific high-stakes question. Use arbitrIQ with full depth, full transparency, and no commitment.

  • One end-to-end strategic analysis
  • All governance settings configurable
  • Structured contradiction across dimensions
  • Web search & grounding available
  • Decision-ready executive output
  • Results retained in your workspace
Run one analysis
Most Popular
Professional
199€/mo

For teams running recurring strategic scenarios.

  • Governance framework
  • Up to 50 analyses/month
  • Up to 5 dimensions
  • Up to 6 debate turns
  • Web search activated
  • Executive reports
  • Flagship LLMs
  • Includes 50€ credit
Choose Professional
Strategist
499€/mo

For leadership teams making high-stakes decisions.

  • Everything in Professional, plus:
  • Up to 200 analyses/month
  • Up to 7 dimensions
  • Up to 10 debate turns
  • Web search on all turns
  • Beta features
  • Includes 150€ credit
Choose Strategist
Enterprise

For organizations integrating arbitrIQ into formal governance processes, contact us.

  • Customized deployments?
  • Connection with company-specific LLMs?
  • Integration of company's data / vector databases?
  • Training and advanced technical support?
  • Strategic consulting?
  • Other needs?
Contact us

Ready to elevate your decisions?

Run your first strategic decision through arbitrIQ.

Launch arbitrIQ

Analysis informs decisions. Governance protects them.